agent-kit vs Cohesivity

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose agent-kit if you use Claude Code or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Cohesivity if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Cohesivity if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.

Show all rows
Comparison of agent-kit, Cohesivity
Pluginagent-kit

agent-kit-startup/agent-kit

Cohesivity

cohesivity/cohesivity

Works withClaude Code, Codex, CursorCodex, MCP
Trust score97/10076/100
Security scanNo issues flagged (100/100, 39 findings)No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings)
Directory listingsListed in 0 of 5 checkedListed in 1 of 5 checked
Release integrity6.12.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices
Owner verifiedYesNot reported
Skills391
MCP servers02
Version6.1.15.0.5
Developeragent-kit-startupCohesivity
CategoryDevelopment & WorkflowTools & Integrations

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog