agent-kit vs iris-agentic-dev
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose agent-kit if you use Codex or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose iris-agentic-dev if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose agent-kit if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
- Choose iris-agentic-dev if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 8 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | agent-kit agent-kit-startup/agent-kit | iris-agentic-dev intersystems-community/iris-dev |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Claude Code, MCP |
| Trust score | 97/100 | 68/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (100/100, 39 findings) | Caution (64/100, 42 findings) |
| Release integrity | 6.12.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported |
| MCP servers | 0 | 1 |
| Version | 6.1.1 | 1.5.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-10 |
| Developer | agent-kit-startup | intersystems-community |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.