Session Orchestrator vs Cohesivity
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Session Orchestrator if you use Claude Code or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Cohesivity if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Session Orchestrator bernhard-goetzendorfer/session-orchestrator | Cohesivity cohesivity/cohesivity |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 83/100 | 76/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (100/100, 208 findings) | No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 2 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | 5.16.0+codex.20261029014223 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | 5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices |
| Skills | 208 | 1 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 2 |
| Version | 5.12.0+codex.20261011193338 | 5.0.5 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-12 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developer | Bernhard Goetzendorfer | Cohesivity |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.