Codex SEO vs agentic-seo
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose Codex SEO if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Codex SEO if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
- Choose Codex SEO if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Codex SEO bestlemoon/codex-seo | agentic-seo dalroot/agentic-seo |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Codex, MCP | Codex |
| Trust score | 78/100 | 74/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (95/100, 23 findings) | Caution (59/100, 177 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | 1.8.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | 3.0.1 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 22 | 173 |
| MCP servers | 3 | 0 |
| Version | 1.8.0 | 0.0.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-24 |
| Developer | BestLemoon | dalroot |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.