Cohesivity vs Agentic Ship
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Cohesivity if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Agentic Ship if you use Claude Code or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Cohesivity if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Cohesivity cohesivity/cohesivity | Agentic Ship moasq/agentic-ship |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Codex, MCP | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor |
| Trust score | 76/100 | 79/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings) | Needs review (75/100, 33 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | 5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported |
| Skills | 1 | 28 |
| MCP servers | 2 | 12 |
| Version | 5.0.5 | 0.1.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-20 |
| Developer | Cohesivity | moasq |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.