CoreSpeed vs lumberroom-claude-code vs Tanod

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose CoreSpeed if you use Cursor. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Tanod if you use Agent Plugin or Codex. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.

Show all rows
Comparison of CoreSpeed, lumberroom-claude-code, Tanod
PluginCoreSpeed

corespeed-io/corespeed

Remove
lumberroom-claude-code

lumberroom/lumberroom-memory

Remove
Tanod

tanod-labs/tanod

Remove
Works withClaude Code, Cursor, MCPClaude CodeAgent Plugin, Codex, MCP
Trust score62/10059/10072/100
Security scanCaution (54/100, 7 findings)Caution (54/100, 7 findings)Needs review (71/100, 16 findings)
Release integrity0.3.5 recorded on 1 channel, no open noticesNot reportedNot reported
Owner verifiedNot reportedNot reportedYes
Skills2213
Version0.2.10.5.41.0.0
Last updated2026-10-152026-10-142026-10-12
Developercorespeed-iolumberroomtanod-labs
CategoryTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & WorkflowTools & Integrations

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog