CoreSpeed vs Tanod
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose CoreSpeed if you use Claude Code or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Tanod if you use Agent Plugin or Codex. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 9 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | CoreSpeed corespeed-io/corespeed | Tanod tanod-labs/tanod |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Cursor, MCP | Agent Plugin, Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 62/100 | 72/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (54/100, 7 findings) | Needs review (71/100, 16 findings) |
| Release integrity | 0.3.5 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 2 | 13 |
| Version | 0.2.1 | 1.0.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-12 |
| Developer | corespeed-io | tanod-labs |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.