agentic-seo vs SearchLink Lite
Side-by-side comparison
These work together
They provide different kinds of components and share a runtime, so they can be installed together.
- Choose SearchLink Lite if you use Claude Code or MCP. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose agentic-seo if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.
- Choose SearchLink Lite if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | agentic-seo dalroot/agentic-seo | SearchLink Lite globalmatchhub/searchlink-lite |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Codex | Claude Code, Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 74/100 | 65/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (59/100, 177 findings) | Caution (64/100, 3 findings) |
| Release integrity | 3.0.1 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 173 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 1 |
| Version | 0.0.0 | 0.2.2 |
| Developer | dalroot | GlobalMatchHub |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.