Codex Usage Tracker vs SessionCost
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose Codex Usage Tracker if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose SessionCost if you use Agent Plugin or Claude Code or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Codex Usage Tracker if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Codex Usage Tracker douglasmonsky/codex-usage-tracker | SessionCost kish21/sessioncost |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Codex, MCP | Agent Plugin, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor |
| Trust score | 65/100 | 73/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (64/100, 10 findings) | Caution (59/100, 6 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | 0.28.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 7 | 2 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 0 |
| Version | 0.28.0 | 0.5.12 |
| Last updated | 2026-09-20 | 2026-10-13 |
| Developer | douglasmonsky | kish21 |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.