Codex Usage Tracker vs SessionCost vs token-optimizer

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose Codex Usage Tracker if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose SessionCost if you use Agent Plugin or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.

Show all rows
Comparison of Codex Usage Tracker, SessionCost, token-optimizer
PluginCodex Usage Tracker

douglasmonsky/codex-usage-tracker

Remove
SessionCost

kish21/sessioncost

Remove
token-optimizer

ooples/token-optimizer

Remove
Works withCodex, MCPAgent Plugin, Claude Code, Codex, CursorClaude Code, Codex
Trust score65/10073/10071/100
Security scanCaution (64/100, 10 findings)Caution (59/100, 6 findings)Needs review (71/100, 4 findings)
Release integrity0.28.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open noticesNot reportedNot reported
Owner verifiedNot reportedYesNot reported
Skills721
MCP servers101
Version0.28.00.5.127.5.1
Last updated2026-09-202026-10-132026-10-15
Developerdouglasmonskykish21ooples
CategoryTools & IntegrationsTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & Workflow

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog