pg-perf-mcp vs agent-kit
Side-by-side comparison
These work together
They provide different kinds of components and share a runtime, so they can be installed together.
- Choose pg-perf-mcp if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose agent-kit if you use Codex or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose agent-kit if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
- Choose agent-kit if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.
- Choose pg-perf-mcp if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 9 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | pg-perf-mcp gouranshul/pg-perf | agent-kit agent-kit-startup/agent-kit |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, MCP | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor |
| Trust score | 65/100 | 97/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) | No issues flagged (100/100, 39 findings) |
| Release integrity | Not reported | 6.12.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices |
| Skills | 0 | 39 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 0 |
| Version | 0.1.0 | 6.1.1 |
| Developer | gouranshul | agent-kit-startup |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.