pg-perf-mcp vs Session Orchestrator

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose pg-perf-mcp if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Session Orchestrator if you use Codex or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Session Orchestrator if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
  • Choose Session Orchestrator if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.

Show all rows
Comparison of pg-perf-mcp, Session Orchestrator
Pluginpg-perf-mcp

gouranshul/pg-perf

Session Orchestrator

bernhard-goetzendorfer/session-orchestrator

Works withClaude Code, MCPClaude Code, Codex, Cursor
Trust score65/10083/100
Security scanCaution (59/100, 4 findings)No issues flagged (100/100, 208 findings)
Directory listingsListed in 0 of 5 checkedListed in 2 of 5 checked
Release integrityNot reported5.16.0+codex.20261029014223 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices
Owner verifiedYesNot reported
Skills0208
Version0.1.05.12.0+codex.20261011193338
Last updated2026-10-152026-10-12
DevelopergouranshulBernhard Goetzendorfer
CategoryTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & Workflow

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog