pg-perf-mcp vs Cohesivity vs Session Orchestrator

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose Session Orchestrator if you use Cursor. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Showing 12 of 14 rows that differ.

Show all rows
Comparison of pg-perf-mcp, Cohesivity, Session Orchestrator
Pluginpg-perf-mcp

gouranshul/pg-perf

Remove
Cohesivity

cohesivity/cohesivity

Remove
Session Orchestrator

bernhard-goetzendorfer/session-orchestrator

Remove
Works withClaude Code, MCPCodex, MCPClaude Code, Codex, Cursor
Trust score65/10076/10083/100
Security scanCaution (59/100, 4 findings)No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings)No issues flagged (100/100, 208 findings)
Directory listingsListed in 0 of 5 checkedListed in 1 of 5 checkedListed in 2 of 5 checked
Release integrityNot reported5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices5.16.0+codex.20261029014223 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices
Owner verifiedYesNot reportedNot reported
Skills01208
MCP servers121
Version0.1.05.0.55.12.0+codex.20261011193338
Last updated2026-10-152026-10-152026-10-12
DevelopergouranshulCohesivityBernhard Goetzendorfer
CategoryTools & IntegrationsTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & Workflow

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog