pg-perf-mcp vs Cohesivity vs iris-agentic-dev

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose Cohesivity if you use Codex. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Cohesivity if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.

Show all rows
Comparison of pg-perf-mcp, Cohesivity, iris-agentic-dev
Pluginpg-perf-mcp

gouranshul/pg-perf

Remove
Cohesivity

cohesivity/cohesivity

Remove
iris-agentic-dev

intersystems-community/iris-dev

Remove
Works withClaude Code, MCPCodex, MCPClaude Code, MCP
Trust score65/10076/10068/100
Security scanCaution (59/100, 4 findings)No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings)Caution (64/100, 42 findings)
Release integrityNot reported5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open noticesNot reported
Owner verifiedYesNot reportedYes
Skills0139
MCP servers121
Version0.1.05.0.51.5.0
Last updated2026-10-152026-10-152026-10-10
DevelopergouranshulCohesivityintersystems-community
CategoryTools & IntegrationsTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & Workflow

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog