pg-perf-mcp vs iris-agentic-dev vs Kaiva Postgres MCP
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose iris-agentic-dev if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 9 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | pg-perf-mcp gouranshul/pg-perf Remove | iris-agentic-dev intersystems-community/iris-dev Remove | Kaiva Postgres MCP ai.kaiv/postgres Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, MCP | Claude Code, MCP | MCP |
| Trust score | 65/100 | 68/100 | Not reported |
| Security scan | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) | Caution (64/100, 42 findings) | Needs review (82/100, 6 findings) |
| Owner verified | Yes | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 0 | 39 | 0 |
| Version | 0.1.0 | 1.5.0 | 0.1.1 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-10 | 2026-10-21 |
| Developer | gouranshul | intersystems-community | ai.kaiv |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow | MCP server |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.