Agent402 vs Ontoly vs Click

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose Agent402 if you use Cursor or MCP. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Agent402 if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.

Show all rows
Comparison of Agent402, Ontoly, Click
PluginAgent402

havok-holdings-llc/agent402

Remove
Ontoly

0xsarwagya/ontoly

Remove
Click

junseok-pak/click

Remove
Works withCodex, Cursor, MCPCodexCodex
Trust score98/10096/10094/100
Security scanNo issues flagged (100/100, 1 finding)No issues flagged (100/100, 1 finding)No issues flagged (95/100, 3 findings)
Release integrityNot reported0.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open noticesNot reported
Skills112
MCP servers100
Version2.7.00.1.01.3.0
Last updated2026-10-152026-09-202026-09-29
DeveloperHavok Holdings LLC0xsarwagyaJunseok Pak
CategoryTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & WorkflowDevelopment & Workflow

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog