Agent402 vs Click
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Agent402 if you use Cursor or MCP. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Agent402 if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Agent402 havok-holdings-llc/agent402 | Click junseok-pak/click |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Codex, Cursor, MCP | Codex |
| Trust score | 98/100 | 94/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (100/100, 1 finding) | No issues flagged (95/100, 3 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked |
| Skills | 1 | 2 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 0 |
| Version | 2.7.0 | 1.3.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-29 |
| Developer | Havok Holdings LLC | Junseok Pak |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.