iris-agentic-dev vs Nullcost
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Nullcost if you use Codex. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | iris-agentic-dev intersystems-community/iris-dev | Nullcost nullcost/nullcost-catalog |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, MCP | Claude Code, Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 68/100 | 63/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (64/100, 42 findings) | Caution (64/100, 6 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked |
| Owner verified | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 39 | 3 |
| Version | 1.5.0 | 0.1.5 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-10 | 2026-09-20 |
| Developer | intersystems-community | Nullcost |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.