SessionCost vs token-optimizer
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose SessionCost if you use Agent Plugin or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose token-optimizer if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | SessionCost kish21/sessioncost | token-optimizer ooples/token-optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Agent Plugin, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Claude Code, Codex |
| Trust score | 73/100 | 71/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (59/100, 6 findings) | Needs review (71/100, 4 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked |
| Owner verified | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 2 | 1 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 1 |
| Version | 0.5.12 | 7.5.1 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developer | kish21 | ooples |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.