LMCP vs Tanod
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose LMCP if you use Antigravity CLI or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Tanod if you use Agent Plugin. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose LMCP if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 8 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | LMCP lmcp/local-mcp | Tanod tanod-labs/tanod |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Antigravity CLI, Codex, Cursor, MCP | Agent Plugin, Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 83/100 | 72/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (100/100, 8 findings) | Needs review (71/100, 16 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 8 | 13 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-12 |
| Developer | LMCP | tanod-labs |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.