Agentic Ship vs Codex Usage Tracker
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Agentic Ship if you use Claude Code or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Codex Usage Tracker if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Agentic Ship moasq/agentic-ship | Codex Usage Tracker douglasmonsky/codex-usage-tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 79/100 | 65/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (75/100, 33 findings) | Caution (64/100, 10 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | 0.28.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices |
| Skills | 28 | 7 |
| MCP servers | 12 | 1 |
| Version | 0.1.0 | 0.28.0 |
| Developer | moasq | douglasmonsky |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.