Agentic Ship vs Ophis vs TNT House Risk-Data API
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Agentic Ship if you use Cursor. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Agentic Ship moasq/agentic-ship Remove | Ophis ophis/ophis Remove | TNT House Risk-Data API tnt-house/tnt-house-risk-data-api Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Claude Code, Codex, MCP | Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 79/100 | 78/100 | 76/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (75/100, 33 findings) | Caution (66/100, 5 findings) | Caution (66/100, 4 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes | Yes |
| Skills | 28 | 1 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 12 | 1 | 1 |
| Version | 0.1.0 | 0.1.0 | 1.14.0 |
| Developer | moasq | Ophis | TNT House |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.