token-optimizer vs Sando vs Agentic Ship
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Agentic Ship if you use Cursor. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 11 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | token-optimizer ooples/token-optimizer Remove | Sando independent/sando Remove | Agentic Ship moasq/agentic-ship Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex | Claude Code, Codex | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor |
| Trust score | 71/100 | 85/100 | 79/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (71/100, 4 findings) | Needs review (83/100, 2 findings) | Needs review (75/100, 33 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 1 | 0 | 28 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| Version | 7.5.1 | 0.8.3 | 0.1.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-20 |
| Developer | ooples | Independent | moasq |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.