token-optimizer vs Codex Token Watch vs token-bar
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose token-optimizer if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.
- Choose token-optimizer if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | token-optimizer ooples/token-optimizer Remove | Codex Token Watch premk134/codex-token-watch Remove | token-bar santosli/token-bar Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex | Codex | Claude Code |
| Trust score | 71/100 | 64/100 | 62/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (71/100, 4 findings) | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes | Yes |
| Skills | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 7.5.1 | 0.0.0 | 2.3.3 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developer | ooples | premk134 | santosli |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.