CloudBase AI Toolkit vs pg-perf-mcp
Side-by-side comparison
These work together
They provide different kinds of components and share a runtime, so they can be installed together.
- Choose CloudBase AI Toolkit if you use Antigravity CLI or Cursor or Kimi Code. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose CloudBase AI Toolkit if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.
- Choose pg-perf-mcp if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 8 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | CloudBase AI Toolkit tencentcloudbase/cloudbase-ai-toolkit | pg-perf-mcp gouranshul/pg-perf |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Cursor, Kimi Code, MCP | Claude Code, MCP |
| Trust score | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (64/100, 149 findings) | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 146 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 1 |
| Version | 1.8.44 | 0.1.0 |
| Developer | TencentCloudBase | gouranshul |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.