oddyssey vs CloudBase AI Toolkit
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose oddyssey if you use Agent Plugin. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose CloudBase AI Toolkit if you use Antigravity CLI or Cursor or Kimi Code. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose oddyssey if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
- Choose oddyssey if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | oddyssey using-system/oddyssey | CloudBase AI Toolkit tencentcloudbase/cloudbase-ai-toolkit |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Agent Plugin, Claude Code, MCP | Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Cursor, Kimi Code, MCP |
| Trust score | 89/100 | 63/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (90/100, 12 findings) | Caution (64/100, 149 findings) |
| Owner verified | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 9 | 146 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 0 |
| Version | 1.13.3 | 1.8.44 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developer | using-system | TencentCloudBase |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.