Val Town vs Agentic Ship vs Loadster
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
No single reported fact sets one of these apart. Compare the rows below against your needs.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Showing 10 of 14 rows that differ.
Show all rows| Plugin | Val Town val-town/vals Remove | Agentic Ship moasq/agentic-ship Remove | Loadster com.loadster/loadster-mcp Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, MCP | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | MCP |
| Trust score | 62/100 | 79/100 | Not reported |
| Security scan | Caution (66/100, 15 findings) | Needs review (75/100, 33 findings) | Not reported |
| Directory listings | Listed in 2 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Skills | 11 | 28 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 12 | 1 |
| Version | 0.4.0 | 0.1.0 | 1.6.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-20 | 2026-10-29 |
| Developer | Val Town | moasq | com.loadster |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow | MCP server |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.