Codex Usage Tracker vs SessionCost vs token-optimizer

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose Codex Usage Tracker if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose SessionCost if you use Agent Plugin or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Comparing 3 plugins on 14 facts.

Show only differences
Comparison of Codex Usage Tracker, SessionCost, token-optimizer
PluginCodex Usage Tracker

douglasmonsky/codex-usage-tracker

Remove
SessionCost

kish21/sessioncost

Remove
token-optimizer

ooples/token-optimizer

Remove
Works withCodex, MCPAgent Plugin, Claude Code, Codex, CursorClaude Code, Codex
Trust score65/10073/10071/100
Security scanCaution (64/100, 10 findings)Caution (59/100, 6 findings)Needs review (71/100, 4 findings)
Directory listingsNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Release integrity0.28.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open noticesNot reportedNot reported
Owner verifiedNot reportedYesNot reported
Skills721
MCP servers101
Apps000
Version0.28.00.5.127.5.1
Last updated2026-09-202026-10-132026-10-15
Developerdouglasmonskykish21ooples
CategoryTools & IntegrationsTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & Workflow
Paid placementNoneNoneNone

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog