Codex Usage Tracker vs token-optimizer vs limitwise
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Codex Usage Tracker if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose token-optimizer if you use Claude Code. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose limitwise if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 3 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | Codex Usage Tracker douglasmonsky/codex-usage-tracker Remove | token-optimizer ooples/token-optimizer Remove | limitwise limitwise-contributors/limitwise Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works with | Codex, MCP | Claude Code, Codex | Codex |
| Trust score | 65/100 | 71/100 | 83/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (64/100, 10 findings) | Needs review (71/100, 4 findings) | No issues flagged (95/100, 2 findings) |
| Directory listings | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Release integrity | 0.28.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 0.28.0 | 7.5.1 | 1.0.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-09-20 | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-28 |
| Developer | douglasmonsky | ooples | LimitWise contributors |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow | Development & Workflow |
| Paid placement | None | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.