pg-perf-mcp vs Cohesivity vs iris-agentic-dev

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose Cohesivity if you use Codex. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Cohesivity if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Comparing 3 plugins on 14 facts.

Show only differences
Comparison of pg-perf-mcp, Cohesivity, iris-agentic-dev
Pluginpg-perf-mcp

gouranshul/pg-perf

Remove
Cohesivity

cohesivity/cohesivity

Remove
iris-agentic-dev

intersystems-community/iris-dev

Remove
Works withClaude Code, MCPCodex, MCPClaude Code, MCP
Trust score65/10076/10068/100
Security scanCaution (59/100, 4 findings)No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings)Caution (64/100, 42 findings)
Directory listingsNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Release integrityNot reported5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open noticesNot reported
Owner verifiedYesNot reportedYes
Skills0139
MCP servers121
Apps000
Version0.1.05.0.51.5.0
Last updated2026-10-152026-10-152026-10-10
DevelopergouranshulCohesivityintersystems-community
CategoryTools & IntegrationsTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & Workflow
Paid placementNoneNoneNone

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog