pg-perf-mcp vs Cohesivity vs Val Town

Side-by-side comparison

These are alternatives

They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.

  • Choose Val Town if you use Cursor. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Cohesivity if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Comparing 3 plugins on 14 facts.

Show only differences
Comparison of pg-perf-mcp, Cohesivity, Val Town
Pluginpg-perf-mcp

gouranshul/pg-perf

Remove
Cohesivity

cohesivity/cohesivity

Remove
Val Town

val-town/vals

Remove
Works withClaude Code, MCPCodex, MCPClaude Code, Codex, Cursor, MCP
Trust score65/10076/10062/100
Security scanCaution (59/100, 4 findings)No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings)Caution (66/100, 15 findings)
Directory listingsNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Release integrityNot reported5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open noticesNot reported
Owner verifiedYesNot reportedNot reported
Skills0111
MCP servers121
Apps000
Version0.1.05.0.50.4.0
Last updated2026-10-152026-10-152026-09-25
DevelopergouranshulCohesivityVal Town
CategoryTools & IntegrationsTools & IntegrationsTools & Integrations
Paid placementNoneNoneNone

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog