agent-kit vs pg-perf-mcp
Side-by-side comparison
These work together
They provide different kinds of components and share a runtime, so they can be installed together.
- Choose agent-kit if you use Codex or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose pg-perf-mcp if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose agent-kit if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
- Choose agent-kit if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.
- Choose pg-perf-mcp if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | agent-kit agent-kit-startup/agent-kit | pg-perf-mcp gouranshul/pg-perf |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Claude Code, MCP |
| Trust score | 97/100 | 65/100 |
| Security scan | No issues flagged (100/100, 39 findings) | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | 6.12.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Yes | Yes |
| Skills | 39 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 6.1.1 | 0.1.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developer | agent-kit-startup | gouranshul |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.