Grupr vs Bowmark
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose Bowmark if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | Grupr ai.grupr/grupr | Bowmark ai.bowmark/bowmark |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | MCP | MCP |
| Trust score | Not reported | Not reported |
| Security scan | Needs review (84/100, 2 findings) | No issues flagged (91/100, 1 finding) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Not reported |
| Skills | 0 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 0.18.0 | 8.201.1 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-30 |
| Developer | ai.grupr | ai.bowmark |
| Category | MCP server | MCP server |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.