pg-perf-mcp vs Automata
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose pg-perf-mcp if you use Claude Code. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | pg-perf-mcp gouranshul/pg-perf | Automata app.getautomata/automata |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, MCP | MCP |
| Trust score | 65/100 | Not reported |
| Security scan | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) | Not reported |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 0 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 0.1.0 | 1.2.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-30 |
| Developer | gouranshul | app.getautomata |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | MCP server |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.