pg-perf-mcp vs Session Orchestrator

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose pg-perf-mcp if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Session Orchestrator if you use Codex or Cursor. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Session Orchestrator if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
  • Choose Session Orchestrator if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.

Show only differences
Comparison of pg-perf-mcp, Session Orchestrator
Pluginpg-perf-mcp

gouranshul/pg-perf

Session Orchestrator

bernhard-goetzendorfer/session-orchestrator

Works withClaude Code, MCPClaude Code, Codex, Cursor
Trust score65/10083/100
Security scanCaution (59/100, 4 findings)No issues flagged (100/100, 208 findings)
Directory listingsListed in 0 of 5 checkedListed in 2 of 5 checked
Release integrityNot reported5.16.0+codex.20261029014223 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices
Owner verifiedYesNot reported
Skills0208
MCP servers11
Apps00
Version0.1.05.12.0+codex.20261011193338
Last updated2026-10-152026-10-12
DevelopergouranshulBernhard Goetzendorfer
CategoryTools & IntegrationsDevelopment & Workflow
Paid placementNoneNone

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog