Genexus18MCP vs River Review
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Genexus18MCP if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose River Review if you use Claude Code or Codex. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | Genexus18MCP lennix1337/genexus18mcp | River Review river-review-maintainers/river-review |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | MCP | Claude Code, Codex |
| Trust score | 76/100 | 72/100 |
| Security scan | Caution (64/100, 10 findings) | Caution (64/100, 139 findings) |
| Directory listings | Not reported | Not reported |
| Release integrity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Yes | Not reported |
| Skills | 7 | 136 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 0 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 3.15.0 | 1.129.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developer | lennix1337 | river-review maintainers |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Development & Workflow |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.