Agentic Ship vs Cohesivity vs pg-perf-mcp
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Agentic Ship if you use Cursor. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Cohesivity if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 3 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | Agentic Ship moasq/agentic-ship Remove | Cohesivity cohesivity/cohesivity Remove | pg-perf-mcp gouranshul/pg-perf Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Codex, MCP | Claude Code, MCP |
| Trust score | 79/100 | 76/100 | 65/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (75/100, 33 findings) | No issues flagged (90/100, 3 findings) | Caution (59/100, 4 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | 5.1.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 28 | 1 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 0.1.0 | 5.0.5 | 0.1.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-09-20 | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developer | moasq | Cohesivity | gouranshul |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations | Tools & Integrations |
| Paid placement | None | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.