Agentic Ship vs Loomaly
Side-by-side comparison
How these relate
They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.
- Choose Loomaly if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Loomaly if you want the only one whose security scan flagged no issues. Based on: Security scan.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | Agentic Ship moasq/agentic-ship | Loomaly loomaly/loomaly |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, MCP |
| Trust score | 79/100 | 77/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (75/100, 33 findings) | No issues flagged (90/100, 6 findings) |
| Directory listings | Not reported | Not reported |
| Release integrity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Not reported |
| Skills | 28 | 4 |
| MCP servers | 12 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 0.1.0 | 1.1.5 |
| Last updated | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-28 |
| Developer | moasq | Loomaly |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Tools & Integrations |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.