token-optimizer vs Codex Usage Tracker

Side-by-side comparison

How these relate

They are listed in different categories, so check whether they cover the same job before choosing one.

  • Choose token-optimizer if you use Claude Code. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
  • Choose Codex Usage Tracker if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.

Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.

Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.

Show only differences
Comparison of token-optimizer, Codex Usage Tracker
Plugintoken-optimizer

ooples/token-optimizer

Codex Usage Tracker

douglasmonsky/codex-usage-tracker

Works withClaude Code, CodexCodex, MCP
Trust score71/10065/100
Security scanNeeds review (71/100, 4 findings)Caution (64/100, 10 findings)
Directory listingsListed in 1 of 5 checkedListed in 1 of 5 checked
Release integrityNot reported0.28.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices
Owner verifiedNot reportedNot reported
Skills17
MCP servers11
Apps00
Version7.5.10.28.0
Last updated2026-10-152026-09-20
Developerooplesdouglasmonsky
CategoryDevelopment & WorkflowTools & Integrations
Paid placementNoneNone

Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.

How to compare AI plugins · Back to the catalog