token-optimizer vs Quiver
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose Quiver if you use Cursor or OpenCode. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | token-optimizer ooples/token-optimizer | Quiver yagizdo/quiver |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Claude Code, Codex | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode |
| Trust score | 71/100 | 62/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (71/100, 4 findings) | Caution (54/100, 26 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 1 of 5 checked | Listed in 1 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Not reported | Yes |
| Skills | 1 | 21 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 7.5.1 | 1.26.2 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-11 |
| Developer | ooples | yagizdo |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Development & Workflow |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.