opencode-plugins vs cursor-opencode-provider
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose cursor-opencode-provider if you use Cursor. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | opencode-plugins rizal72/opencode-plugins | cursor-opencode-provider oakimov/cursor-opencode-provider |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | OpenCode | Cursor, OpenCode |
| Trust score | Not reported | Not reported |
| Security scan | Not reported | Not reported |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Yes | Yes |
| Skills | 0 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 0 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-26 |
| Developer | rizal72 | oakimov |
| Category | OpenCode Plugins | OpenCode Plugins |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.