Tanod vs PDFtoAgent (Dow Theory MCP)
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose Tanod if you use Agent Plugin. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose PDFtoAgent (Dow Theory MCP) if you use Claude Code. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose Tanod if you need skills. The others list none. Based on: Skills.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | Tanod tanod-labs/tanod | PDFtoAgent (Dow Theory MCP) babaksh/pdftoagent-hamilton |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Agent Plugin, Codex, MCP | Claude Code, Codex, MCP |
| Trust score | 72/100 | 35/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (71/100, 16 findings) | Unsafe (24/100, 5 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 0 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | 1.0.0 recorded on 1 channel, no open notices |
| Owner verified | Yes | Yes |
| Skills | 13 | 0 |
| MCP servers | 1 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 1.0.0 | 1.0.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-12 | 2026-10-10 |
| Developer | tanod-labs | babaksh |
| Category | Tools & Integrations | Tools & Integrations |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.