VillageSQL Skills vs iris-agentic-dev
Side-by-side comparison
These are alternatives
They are listed in the same category, so they likely cover the same job.
- Choose VillageSQL Skills if you use Agent Plugin or Codex. It is the only one here that lists them. Based on: Works with.
- Choose iris-agentic-dev if you use MCP. It is the only one here that lists it. Based on: Works with.
- Choose iris-agentic-dev if you need MCP servers. The others list none. Based on: MCP servers.
Suggestions use only facts every plugin here reports. They never use Trust Score totals, memberships or paid placement.
Comparing 2 plugins on 14 facts.
Show only differences| Plugin | VillageSQL Skills villagesql/villagesql | iris-agentic-dev intersystems-community/iris-dev |
|---|---|---|
| Works with | Agent Plugin, Claude Code, Codex | Claude Code, MCP |
| Trust score | 69/100 | 68/100 |
| Security scan | Needs review (71/100, 6 findings) | Caution (64/100, 42 findings) |
| Directory listings | Listed in 3 of 5 checked | Listed in 0 of 5 checked |
| Release integrity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Owner verified | Yes | Yes |
| Skills | 3 | 39 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 1 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 |
| Version | 1.0.0 | 1.5.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-10 |
| Developer | VillageSQL | intersystems-community |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Development & Workflow |
| Paid placement | None | None |
Facts come from the public registry record. Directory listings count the public directory lists HOL has read; release integrity is what HOL recorded each channel serving. “Not reported” means there is no value yet; it is not treated as no or zero. Paid placement and HOL memberships do not change any value shown here.