Redpen
Reviews Redpen check, which independently executes repository-defined verification commands and writes an evidence report. Output formatting
Reviews Redpen check, which independently executes repository-defined verification commands and writes an evidence report. Output formatting is not a dry run. Cached report/status/explain commands do not rerun project verification. Boundary reviewed against Redpen 0.3.0 and commit 466df0f (0.4.0 development).
command.redpen · v1.0.0 · Other extensions
- Protection rules
- 1
- Permission checks
- 1
- Mapped commands
- 1
Overview
What this coverage does
Reviews Redpen check, which independently executes repository-defined verification commands and writes an evidence report. Output formatting is not a dry run. Cached report/status/explain commands do not rerun project verification. Boundary reviewed against Redpen 0.3.0 and commit 466df0f (0.4.0 development).
Key facts
- Catalog ID
command.redpen- Version
- v1.0.0
- Kind
- Command coverage
- Category
- Other extensions
- Protection rules
- 1
- Permission checks
- 1
- Mapped commands
- 1
- Maintainer
- Community contributor(community, provenance recorded)
- Source commit
- e2593fe
- Protection model
- External · opt-in
External coverage. It must be enabled through Guard controls; this page does not activate it.
Stated limits
- Coverage is limited to the reviewed operations and the surrounding Guard policy.
- A maintainer profile is not a security certification or an official upstream endorsement.
Command mapping
Every command this extension recognizes, with the catalog default floor Guard applies before workspace policy. Search the table, then open an operation for safe variants and the permission ID.
1 operation · 1 reviewed by default These are catalog defaults, not your workspace policy.
Showing 1 of 1 operations
- Reviewed Guard intercepts the command for review before it runs.High
redpen check --json --timeout 120
Redpen project verification execution
- Default floor
- Reviewed by default. Guard intercepts the command for review before it runs.
- Detector mode
- review
- What it matches
- Identifies direct redpen/redpen-cli check invocations independently of output format or unrecognized options. Disabling this permission blocks only matching direct invocations, not every route to Redpen. Package launchers (including npx redpen-cli check), direct node script paths, and plugin hooks remain outside this rule and retain their independent policy floors; they are not granted allow auth…
- Permission ID
- command.redpen.permission.check
Tool state mapping
No per-tool overrides are declared. Command defaults above resolve through the workspace Guard policy unless a later policy layer changes them.
Runtime identity
- Catalog ID
- command.redpen
- Guard enforcement ID
- command.redpen
- Source path
- contributions/extensions/command.redpen.json
- Contribution digest
sha256…11d482
Action classes
Redpen project verification executionTechnical profile
No independent profile published
This extension has no current independent technical profile. Catalog facts and any legacy launch remain separate and are not presented as profile evidence.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Reviews Redpen check, which independently executes repository-defined verification commands and writes an evidence report. Output formatting is not a dry run. Cached report/status/explain commands do not rerun project verification. Boundary reviewed against Redpen 0.3.0 and commit 466df0f (0.4.0 development). The listing declares 1 rule and 1 permission check. 1 operation · 1 reviewed by default. Coverage is limited to these reviewed operations and the surrounding Guard policy.
External · opt-in: External coverage. It must be enabled through Guard controls; this page does not activate it. Enabling state is always controlled through Guard policy, never from this directory.
This listing entered the catalog as a community contribution through a public pull request with recorded provenance, with public credit to @ChiragArora31, and 1 GitHub maintainer is recorded on the listing. Credit is attribution only. A verified publisher profile and the claim flow verify authority separately; neither is an upstream endorsement or a HOL safety certification.
No. Every listing documents source, activation model, maintainer identity, and stated limitations so you can evaluate coverage before enabling it. Review the stated limitations and the exact source tree before relying on any single control.
1 operation · 1 reviewed by default. Examples: redpen check --json --timeout 120 (reviewed by default). These are catalog defaults, not your workspace policy.
External coverage. It must be enabled through Guard controls; this page does not activate it. Enablement is managed through your workspace's Guard policy and controls — never from this directory. Open the install guidance for the setup flow, then adjust the command coverage for command.redpen in Guard's policy surface.
The matching action is stopped at Guard's pre-action boundary before it executes, and the decision is recorded with evidence your workspace can review. Exact behavior follows your Guard policy combined with this entry's 1 rule and 1 permission check.
No. Guard is local-first: interception, decisions, and evidence stay on your machine unless your workspace explicitly configures cloud features. This page is documentation only — it never executes a command or changes protection state.
Guard runs locally alongside the major AI coding agents and MCP-capable harnesses, so this coverage applies wherever Guard intercepts actions. See the supported harness guides at https://hol.org/guard/harnesses for per-tool approval behavior and limitations.
Guard has a free local tier that includes command interception, evidence, and the policy controls this listing documents. Team plans add shared policy, review queues, and audit surfaces. Current plans: https://hol.org/guard/pricing
Open an issue or pull request against the hol-guard repository, where the canonical catalog lives: https://github.com/hashgraph-online/hol-guard Listings are corrected through the same public review process that adds them.
Yes. Community extensions are merged through public pull requests with recorded provenance, and you can claim the publisher page for a contribution you maintain through the Publisher Studio.
The command mapping table is the audit trail for covered commands and catalog default floors. Pair it with the reviewed rule and permission counts, the per-tool state mapping, and the exact source tree linked from View exact source at the reviewed commit. Guard records enforcement decisions with evidence locally, so what ships matches what you reviewed.