What is MCP tool poisoning?
MCP tool poisoning is when a tool description or schema is malicious or misleading, so the model treats the tool as more trustworthy or capable than it is. Those descriptions can steer planning before a call runs. This hub covers that risk in HOL words; it is not a copy of the OWASP MCP Top 10 long-form text.
Does HOL Guard prevent MCP tool poisoning?
Partially. HOL Guard can require approval when an MCP server changes and when a plugin or skill is installed. Cursor native approvals remain Cursor-owned. Cursor/artifact trust is not full pre-exec of every tool description. Guard is not a complete prompt-injection preventer and does not stop prompt injection before the model reads it.
Does a catalog or plugin scan mean an MCP server is safe?
No. A scan is not a safety guarantee. The current public catalog scanner is registry-broker-fallback static scoring, not a live exploit test. About 205 catalog plugins are not Registry Broker agent counts.
Is HOL Guard a cloud MCP gateway?
No. HOL Guard is local-first runtime control on the developer machine for shell, secrets/file reads, MCP server change, and plugin/skill install. It is not a cloud MCP gateway.