Linting and code review · Any runtime
Agent plugins for linting and code review
Written by AI draft (Claude), pending human review · Reviewed by Michael Kantor on
Direct answer
A catalog search for Linting and code review returns 35 listings; these 5 are built for the task and take different approaches. Choose by the agent you run and whether you need skills, an MCP server or both. The list is not ranked.
Plugins for this task
ox-security/megalinter
Choose it when You work in Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor and Agent Plugin hosts and want what its listing describes: Set up, run and fix MegaLinter on any repository, covering 100+ linters and formatters for 69+ languages and 23+ formats, in CI or locally, with per-linter fix guides… Ships 26 skills.
View listing and setuphyhmrright/brooks-lint
Choose it when You work in Codex, Claude Code and Gemini CLI and want what its listing describes: AI code reviews grounded in six classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severity labels, and four analysis modes (PR review,… Ships 9 skills.
View listing and setupRiver Review
Choose it when You work in Codex and Claude Code and want what its listing describes: Versioned Skill Registry of code-review skills driven by a perspective-based review agent (code, security, performance, architecture, testing, adversarial) that… Ships 136 skills.
View listing and setupHOTL Plugin
Choose it when You work in Claude Code, Cline, Codex and Cursor and want what its listing describes: Human-on-the-Loop AI coding workflow plugin for Codex, Claude Code, and Cline with structured planning, review, and verification guardrails. Ships 20 skills.
View listing and setupNeo
Choose it when You work in Codex and Claude Code and want what its listing describes: Code reasoning plugin for Claude Code and Codex that runs multi-agent analysis over relevant repository files and keeps a local semantic memory, promoting a lesson only… Ships 6 skills.
View listing and setup
Facts side by side
Generated from the HOL catalog. Facts as of . Rows marked “differs” are where the choice is made.
| Fact | River Review | HOTL Plugin | Neo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works withdiffers | Claude Code, Codex | Claude Code, Cline, Codex, Cursor | Claude Code, Codex |
| Trust scorediffers | 72/100 | 66/100 | 59/100 |
| Security scandiffers | Caution (64/100, 139 findings) | Needs review (71/100, 23 findings) | Caution (59/100, 10 findings) |
| Owner verifieddiffers | Not reported | Yes | Not reported |
| Skillsdiffers | 136 | 20 | 6 |
| MCP servers | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Apps | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Versiondiffers | 1.129.0 | 2.22.0 | 0.61.3 |
| Last updateddiffers | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-20 | 2026-10-15 |
| Developerdiffers | river-review maintainers | Yiming Wu | Parslee AI |
| Category | Development & Workflow | Development & Workflow | Development & Workflow |
| Paid placement | None | None | None |
Limitations
- HOL has not yet collected enough setup outcomes to say which of these installs succeed more often.
- Contents and runtimes come from each repository manifest at the last scan and may have changed since.
- Not yet claimed by the owner, so publisher details are unconfirmed: MegaLinter, Brooks Lint, River Review and Neo.
Sources
How this page is made
The fact table comes from catalog data, not from the writer. Choices rest on what each listing does and proves. Paid placement and HOL membership never decide a pick. If a fact is wrong or out of date, report a correction and include this page’s address.