Answer in brief
CVE-2021-47317 records a High severity (CVSS 7.8) vulnerability in powerpc/bpf: Fix detecting BPF atomic instructions. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 7.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Product | Affected versions | Fixed versions |
|---|---|---|
| cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | Not reported | Not reported |
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=91c960b0056672e74627776655c926388350fa30 <7284dab07e4d51d453cc42851fae9ec4fac6ef2f || >=91c960b0056672e74627776655c926388350fa30 <0d435b6d94b05dcfd836d758a63145aa566618e2 || >=91c960b0056672e74627776655c926388350fa30 <419ac821766cbdb9fd85872bb3f1a589df05c94c | 7284dab07e4d51d453cc42851fae9ec4fac6ef2f, 0d435b6d94b05dcfd836d758a63145aa566618e2, 419ac821766cbdb9fd85872bb3f1a589df05c94c |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 5.12 | Not reported |
Published upstream
May 21, 2024
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 4, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/bpf: Fix detecting BPF atomic instructions Commit 91c960b0056672 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm") converted BPF_XADD to BPF_ATOMIC and added a way to distinguish instructions based on the immediate field. Existing JIT implementations were updated to check for the immediate field and to reject programs utilizing anything more than BPF_ADD (such as BPF_FETCH) in the immediate field. However, the check added to powerpc64 JIT did not look at the correct BPF instruction. Due to this, such programs would be accepted and incorrectly JIT'ed resulting in soft lockups, as seen with the atomic bounds test. Fix this by looking at the correct immediate value.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.