HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2022 24840 path traversal in django s3file
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Critical · CVSS 9.1CVE-2022-24840GHSA-4W8F-HJM9-XWGF

Path Traversal in django-s3fileCVE-2022-24840

Answer in brief

CVE-2022-24840 records a Critical severity (CVSS 9.1) vulnerability in Path Traversal in django-s3file. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps django-s3file (pip), django-s3file (pypi), django-s3file (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 6, 2022Updated Oct 28, 2026Source checked Oct 28, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 7, 2026Material review Oct 28, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Critical · CVSS 9.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 9.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps django-s3file (pip), django-s3file (pypi), django-s3file (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
django-s3filepip<5.5.15.5.1
django-s3filepypi>=0 <68ccd2c621a40eb66fdd6af2be9d5fcc9c37331868ccd2c621a40eb66fdd6af2be9d5fcc9c373318
django-s3filepypi>=0 <5.5.15.5.1

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for django-s3file, django-s3file, django-s3file.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update django-s3file to 5.5.1; django-s3file to 68ccd2c621a40eb66fdd6af2be9d5fcc9c373318; django-s3file to 5.5.1 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 6, 2022

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 7, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Impact It was possible to traverse the entire AWS S3 bucket and in most cases to access or delete files. The issue was discovered by the maintainer. There were no reports of the vulnerability being known to or exploited by a third party, before the release of the patch. If the `AWS_LOCATION` setting was set, traversal was limited to that location only. If all your files handling views (like form views) require authentication or special permission, the thread is limited to privileged users. ### Patches The vulnerability has been fixed in version 5.5.1 and above. ### Workarounds There is no feasible workaround. We must urge all users to immediately updated to a patched version. ### Detailed attack vector description An attacker may use a request with malicious form data to traverse the entire AWS S3 bucket and perform destructive operations. An attack could look as follows: ```bash curl -X POST -F "s3file=file" -F "file=/priviliged/location/secrets.txt" https://www.example.com/any/path/will/work/ ``` This will result in a request with files set and opened: ```python >>> request.FILES.getlist("file") [File("/priviliged/location/secrets.txt")] ``` Since this behavior is injected via a middleware, any view can be called this way and will carry any files defined by the attacker. Via the `s3file` form field, any input name can be specified, including multiple inputs. For each input, multiple files can be freely picked of the S3 bucket. #### Scenarios and their practicality There are four scenarios that would be considered practical in most setups: 1. Illegal file injection, 2. file deletion, 3. file retrieval & tree traversal. 4. code injection & remote code execution. ##### File deletion An attacker knows the location of a privileged file, like a static asset. Next, the file is injected into a form view. The upload to function will move the file to a new location. This is effectively deleting the file, since the previous references to it are invalid, and will cause S3 to return a 404. Furthermore, the new location is unknown to the site operator. ##### File retrieval & tree traversal An attacker knows the URL of a secret file and injects it into a form view. The view will move the file to a public location, making it accessible to the attacker. Since most form views will not be rate limited, this could also be used to guess files and traverse the file tree. ##### Illegal file injection An attacker uses any form to upload a file to the temporary upload location. Next, the attacker injects that file into a request, does not validate the contents or is not equipped to handle the mime type. The latter could be used as a potential DOS vector. In practice, this is not a practical risk in most hardened setup. Files should always be sanitized before processing, since files can be included in a request even without this security issues. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue on [GitHub](https://github.com/codingjoe/django-s3file/issues) * Email us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Path Traversal in Wing WFTP Server leading to Remote Code ExecutionAlso CWE-22
  • Path Traversal in Telerik Document Processing Libraries AI Agent ToolsAlso CWE-22
  • OpenHop: Path Traversal in Flow ID File OperationsAlso CWE-22
  • ESPHome Device Builder allows unauthenticated dashboard access via the HA add-on ingress site bound to all interfacesSame pip ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-22, CWE-96
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 28, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record