HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2023 29383 cve program container
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2023-29383

CVE Program ContainerCVE-2023-29383

Answer in brief

CVE-2023-29383 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in CVE Program Container. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps n/a/n/a (generic), Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (generic), Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (generic), Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Apr 14, 2023Updated Oct 14, 2026Source checked Oct 15, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 14, 2026Material review Oct 14, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Buffer Overflow
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-125
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 15, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
15 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps n/a/n/a (generic), Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (generic), Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (generic), Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
n/a/n/agenericn/aNot reported
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000REgeneric>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000generic>=0 <V2.17.0V2.17.0
Siemens/SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPgeneric>=V3.1.0 <V3.1.5V3.1.5
Siemens/SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFPgeneric>=V3.1.0 <V3.1.5V3.1.5
Siemens/SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPgeneric>=V3.1.0 <V3.1.5V3.1.5

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for n/a/n/a, Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000, Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 to V2.17.0; Siemens/RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 to V2.17.0; Siemens/SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP to V3.1.5; Siemens/SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP to V3.1.5; Siemens/SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP to V3.1.5 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Apr 14, 2023

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  2. Source modified

    Oct 14, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 14, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencecert-portal.siemens.com
  • Source referencecert-portal.siemens.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referencelists.debian.org
  • Source referencetrustwave.com
  • Source referencetrustwave.com
Upstream source description

In Shadow 4.13, it is possible to inject control characters into fields provided to the SUID program chfn (change finger). Although it is not possible to exploit this directly (e.g., adding a new user fails because \n is in the block list), it is possible to misrepresent the /etc/passwd file when viewed. Use of \r manipulations and Unicode characters to work around blocking of the : character make it possible to give the impression that a new user has been added. In other words, an adversary may be able to convince a system administrator to take the system offline (an indirect, social-engineered denial of service) by demonstrating that "cat /etc/passwd" shows a rogue user account.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • ggml-org whisper.cpp Model Loader whisper_model_load out-of-boundsAlso CWE-125
  • Improper Authorization in TP-Link Omada Controller TLS Certificate and Private Key Management APISame generic ecosystem
  • sgl-project SGLang generate Endpoint io_struct.py denial of serviceSame generic ecosystem
  • sgl-project SGLang Session Cleanup session_controller.py Session.create_req denial of serviceSame generic ecosystem
  • qs.stringify with arrayFormat comma throws TypeError on array elements that cannot be coerced to a stringSame generic ecosystem
  • FreeRDP 3.0.0 before 3.32.0 Null Pointer Dereference via rdpsnd FragmentSame generic ecosystem