Answer in brief
CVE-2024-35872 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in mm/secretmem: fix GUP-fast succeeding on secretmem folios. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <6564b014af92b677c1f07c44d7f5b595d589cf6e || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <9c2b4b657739ecda38e3b383354a29566955ac48 || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <43fad1d0284de30159661d0badfc3cbaf7e6f8f8 || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <201e4aaf405dfd1308da54448654053004c579b5 || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <65291dcfcf8936e1b23cfd7718fdfde7cfaf7706 | 6564b014af92b677c1f07c44d7f5b595d589cf6e, 9c2b4b657739ecda38e3b383354a29566955ac48, 43fad1d0284de30159661d0badfc3cbaf7e6f8f8, 201e4aaf405dfd1308da54448654053004c579b5, 65291dcfcf8936e1b23cfd7718fdfde7cfaf7706 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 5.14 | Not reported |
Published upstream
May 19, 2024
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 5, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/secretmem: fix GUP-fast succeeding on secretmem folios folio_is_secretmem() currently relies on secretmem folios being LRU folios, to save some cycles. However, folios might reside in a folio batch without the LRU flag set, or temporarily have their LRU flag cleared. Consequently, the LRU flag is unreliable for this purpose. In particular, this is the case when secretmem_fault() allocates a fresh page and calls filemap_add_folio()->folio_add_lru(). The folio might be added to the per-cpu folio batch and won't get the LRU flag set until the batch was drained using e.g., lru_add_drain(). Consequently, folio_is_secretmem() might not detect secretmem folios and GUP-fast can succeed in grabbing a secretmem folio, crashing the kernel when we would later try reading/writing to the folio, because the folio has been unmapped from the directmap. Fix it by removing that unreliable check.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.
Answer in brief
CVE-2024-35872 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in mm/secretmem: fix GUP-fast succeeding on secretmem folios. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <6564b014af92b677c1f07c44d7f5b595d589cf6e || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <9c2b4b657739ecda38e3b383354a29566955ac48 || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <43fad1d0284de30159661d0badfc3cbaf7e6f8f8 || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <201e4aaf405dfd1308da54448654053004c579b5 || >=1507f51255c9ff07d75909a84e7c0d7f3c4b2f49 <65291dcfcf8936e1b23cfd7718fdfde7cfaf7706 | 6564b014af92b677c1f07c44d7f5b595d589cf6e, 9c2b4b657739ecda38e3b383354a29566955ac48, 43fad1d0284de30159661d0badfc3cbaf7e6f8f8, 201e4aaf405dfd1308da54448654053004c579b5, 65291dcfcf8936e1b23cfd7718fdfde7cfaf7706 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 5.14 | Not reported |
Published upstream
May 19, 2024
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 5, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/secretmem: fix GUP-fast succeeding on secretmem folios folio_is_secretmem() currently relies on secretmem folios being LRU folios, to save some cycles. However, folios might reside in a folio batch without the LRU flag set, or temporarily have their LRU flag cleared. Consequently, the LRU flag is unreliable for this purpose. In particular, this is the case when secretmem_fault() allocates a fresh page and calls filemap_add_folio()->folio_add_lru(). The folio might be added to the per-cpu folio batch and won't get the LRU flag set until the batch was drained using e.g., lru_add_drain(). Consequently, folio_is_secretmem() might not detect secretmem folios and GUP-fast can succeed in grabbing a secretmem folio, crashing the kernel when we would later try reading/writing to the folio, because the folio has been unmapped from the directmap. Fix it by removing that unreliable check.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.